Skip to Main Content

Information Literacy Toolkit for Faculty

Integrating information literacy (IL) into coursework and programs.

Information Literacy Standards for Higher Education

These are the higher education information literacy standards suggested by WASC. They include the objectives (standards), performance indicators, and outcomes. Apply at the institutional level, program level, or classroom level. Pick and choose the performance indicators and outcomes you wish to assess under each standard.

Information Literacy Rubric

Curriculum Map

The 5 ACRL Information Literacy Standards

  1. The information literate student determines the nature and extent of the information needed.
  2. The information literate student accesses needed information effectively and efficiently.
  3. The information literate student evaluates information and its sources critically and incorporates selected information into his or her knowledge base and value system.
  4. The information literate student, individually or as a member of a group, uses information effectively to accomplish a specific purpose.
  5. The information literate student understands many of the economic, legal, and social issues surrounding the use of information and accesses and uses information ethically and legally.

Determine Information Need: ACRL Standard One

The hardest part of research for students is getting started. According to Project Information Literacy, 84% of students reported that they struggle to even begin.

What students need to know:

  • How to develop a thesis statement (concept mapping).
  • How to find background information (resource types).
  • What types of resources are needed (books, journal articles, raw data, scholarly or nonacademic, primary, secondary, tertiary).

Pick appropriate performance indicators and outcomes for the student level and need.

EXAMPLES for  Standard One

"Lower Order" thinking skill:
Outcome 1.1.e. Identifies key concepts and terms that describe the information need.

"Higher Order" thinking skill:
Outcome 1.1.f. Recognizes that existing information can be combined with original thought, experimentation, and/or analysis to produce new information.

Want a librarian to teach this and other competencies to your students? Visit our Library Instruction page!

Find Information: ACRL Standard Two

Students often do not know how to approach research with a strategy in mind (terminology to use, types of resources to consult, which databases to search, etc.). They also try to search library databases like they search the web using tools such as Google (i.e. using full sentences, etc.). The identification of types of resources is foreign to them - it is all just INFORMATION and the rest of the picture is blurry and doesn't matter.

What students need to know:

  • How to craft a search strategy (research plan)
  • How to identify keywords and synonyms using the thesis statement and research questions
  • How to identify discipline specific language
  • How to access and search the library catalog and research databases
  • How to identify appropriate subject headings for the catalog or research database being searched
  • How to broaden or narrow a search using AND, OR, and NOT (boolean logic)
  • How to use truncation and wildcards when searching the catalog or research databases
  • How to recognize different types and formats of resources (books, book chapters/essays, journal articles, conference proceedings, etc.)

Pick appropriate performance indicators and outcomes for the student level and need.

EXAMPLES for  Standard Two

"Lower Order" thinking skill:
Outcome 2.2.b. Identifies keywords, synonyms, and related terms for the information needed.

"Higher Order" thinking skill:
Outcome 2.2.e. Implements the search strategy in various information retrieval systems using diffferent user interfaces and search engines, with different command languages, protocols, and search parameters.

Want a librarian to teach this and other competencies to your students? Visit our Library Instruction page!

 

Evaluate Information: ACRL Standard Three

Students don't always distinguish between the different resource categories such as primary, secondary, scholarly, trade, and popular. They are also at a loss as to how to go about evaluating a source, especially when they are novices to a discipline.

What students need to know:

  • How to determine whether a source is a primary, secondary, scholarly, trade, or popular source
  • What criteria to use when evaluating sources
  • Determine if their sources meet assignment criteria
  • Determine if their sources help or hinder their argument(s)

Pick appropriate performance indicators and outcomes for the student level and need.

EXAMPLES for  Standard Three

"Lower Order" thinking skill:
Outcome 3.1.a. Reads the text and selects main ideas.

"Higher Order" thinking skill:
Outcome 3.3.b. Extends initial synthesis, when possible, to a higher level of abstraction to construct new hypotheses that may require additional information.

Want a librarian to teach this and other competencies to your students? Visit our Library Instruction page!

Synthesize Information: ACRL Standard Four

Students often find a variety of sources but do not know how to synthesize the information from those sources into the assignment. There can be a disconnect between the content of the assignment and the sources used and cited.

What students need to know:

  • How to organize search results
  • How to synthesize information into the research project

Organizing Information

Once a student has found and evaluated information, she will need to organize it. It will allow her to apply information in a way that increases her ability to be understood. There are various ways to organize information:

Categorically or Conceptually
Useful when discussing the pros and cons of an idea.
Example: A persuasive essay about differential instruction in a classroom.
Chronologically
Useful when explaining an outcome.
Example: Explaining the progression of patient treatment in a physical therapy ward.
Hierarchically
Useful when information needs to be in a specific order.
Example: A guide for diagnosing a patient's illness, starting with the most simple and moving up.
Alphabetically
Useful for presentations and organizing specialized vocabulary.
Example: A student is writing a discipline-specific paper and needs to know key terms' definitions. Placing them in alphabetical order helps her find them more easily.

Synthesizing Information

Synthesis involves determining the importance of information and how it relates to the end product. A student must constantly ask: How will this information help me accomplish my goal? Here are some steps students can follow while reading resources:

  • Summarizing the information
    • Outline
    • Notecards
  • Determining how the information relates to your project
    • Does it provide evidence for or against?
    • Does it provide key background information to assist your readers in understanding your argument?
  • Arguing and reflecting with information
    • Do you agree with the points as presented? Why or why not?
  • Discovering how the information moves your project forward or backward

Pick appropriate performance indicators and outcomes for the student level and need.

EXAMPLES for  Standard Four

"Lower Order" thinking skill:
Outcome 4.1.a. Organizes the content in a manner that supports the purposes and format of the product or performance (e.g. outlines, drafts, storyboards).

"Higher Order" thinking skill:
Outcome 4.1.b. Articulates knowledge and skills transferred from prior experiences to planning and creating the product or performance.

Want a librarian to teach this and other competencies to your students? Visit our Library Instruction page!

Ethically Use Information: ACRL Standard Five

At this stage of research a student will be:

  • Writing a bibliography/works cited page.
  • Citing quotes and paraphrasing into the body of their paper.

Discussing Plagiarism

Students are not sure what counts as plagiarism. For example, if they sum up a plot of a book, do they need to include a citation? Project Information Literacy has indicated that providing the grounds for citation in a class enables students to understand what plagiarism is and how to avoid it.

Here are some suggested questions for classroom discussion:

  • What do you think plagiarism is?
  • Do you know the University's policy on plagiarism?
  • Why is it inappropriate?
  • Can you name some examples of plagiarism?
  • Why might a student plagiarize?

Explain the need for citing in papers.

During this stage, a student will:

  • Use RefWorks to manage citations and generate a bibliography
  • Check citations against APA's rules
  • Proof-read a paper for grammar and correct citations

Pick appropriate performance indicators and outcomes for the student level and need.

EXAMPLES for  Standard Five

"Lower Order" thinking skill:
Outcome 5.2.f. Demonstrates an understanding of what constitutes plagiarism and does not represent work attributable to others as his/her own.

"Higher Order" thinking skill:
Outcome 5.1.a. Identifies and discusses issues related to privacy and security in both the print and electronic environments.

Want a librarian to teach this and other competencies to your students? Visit our Library Instruction page!