Dawn Stahura, “ACT UP: Evaluating Sources,” accessed July 4, 2020 (https://www.emaze.com/@ATIFORFQ/ACT-UP:Evaluating-Resources)
The ACT UP method of evaluating sources is about "shifting the research paradigm to make room for other voices". Knowing about "systemic oppressions in classification systems" provides researchers with skills to be more informed decision makers. To ACT UP in research is to "recognize the importance of discerning fact from fiction and how these research skills can allow [researchers] to be more socially just in all facets of their lives."
Stahura, Dawn. "ACT UP for evaluating sources: Pushing against privilege" College & Research Libraries News [Online], Volume 79 Number 10 (8 November 2018) Available: https://crln.acrl.org/index.php/crlnews/article/view/17434/19242
Now that you've found information, you will need to evaluate that information for academic quality and determine if it will address your research needs.
Video produced by the NYIT Library.
The CRAAP Method (aka CRAAP Test) is a method used to evaluate information for appropriate academic quality. Apply the following criteria to your information to see if it should be used. Criteria in red apply to Internet websites.
Currency = timeliness of the information
Relevance = the importance of the information
Authority = credibility of the source of the information
Accuracy = reliability or truthfulness of the content
Purpose = reason the information exists
(The ACT UP method of evaluating sources is similar to the CRAAP method but adds a component for determining if there are some missing voices in the research. It is not to be confused with the AIDS Coalition to Unleash Power (ACT UP) international grassroots political group working to end the AIDS pandemic.)
A - author. Who wrote the resource? Who are they? Background information matters.
C - currency. When was this resource written? When was it published? Does this resource fit into the currency of your topic?
T - truth. How accurate is this information? Can you verify any of the claims in other sources? Are there typos and spelling mistakes?
U - unbiased. Is the information presented to sway the audience to a particular point of view? Resources unless otherwise stated should be impartial.
P - privilege. Check the privilege of the author(s). Are they the only folks who might write or publish on this topic? Who is missing in this conversation? Critically evaluate the subject terms associated with each resource you found. How are they described? What are the inherent biases?